Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Linkedin Posts results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 474 hits. Analysis detected 4,892 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,995 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 85% (2,571 of 16,562 topics). This Linkedin Posts is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Linkedin Posts
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,995
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.5% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 23.8%23.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 15.6%15.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 15.0%15.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.3%17.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 11.0%11.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 9.4%9.4%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.7%Red Herring: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 0.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Special Pleading: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos