Topic summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Linguistic Diversity results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 1,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,082 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,151 of 16,562 topics). This Linguistic Diversity is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Linguistic Diversity
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠45%Linguistic Diversity (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,082
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos