Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 707 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Life Extension results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 359 hits . Analysis detected 2,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,657 of 16,562 topics). This Life Extension is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group. Life Extension
Topic details
Total words: 2,828
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst