Topic summary
48%1 analyzed article/video781 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Libertarian Party Of Russia results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 2,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,343 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,507 of 16,562 topics). This Libertarian Party Of Russia is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Libertarian Party Of Russia
Topic details
Total words: 2,343
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.8% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos