Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These LGBTQ Pride results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 1,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This LGBTQ Pride is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
LGBTQ Pride
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,672
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos