Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legislative Proposal results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 314 hits . Analysis detected 1,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 50% (7,717 of 15,300 topics). This Legislative Proposal is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Legislative Proposal
Topic details
Total words: 2,068
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.2% 15.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst