Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Legislative Plan results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 350 hits. Analysis detected 2,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,345 topics). This Legislative Plan is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Legislative Plan
Topic details
Total words: 3,198
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos