Topic summary
⁠36%2 analyzed articles/videos2,445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legislative Attendance results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 540 hits. Analysis detected 5,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,335 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,331 of 15,765 topics). This Legislative Attendance is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group.
Legislative Attendance
Topic details
Total words: 7,335
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510015.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos