Topic summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video2,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legislative Advocacy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 694 hits. Analysis detected 2,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (20,235 of 20,975 topics). This Legislative Advocacy is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
Legislative Advocacy
Topic details
Total words: 9,176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751003.5% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos