Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video490 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Battle Over Federal Authority results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 54.7% saturation with 804 hits. Analysis detected 3,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,470 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,648 of 16,562 topics). This Legal Battle Over Federal Authority is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Legal Battle Over Federal Authority
Topic details
Total words: 1,470
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.1% percentile
8.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 54.7%54.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.0%28.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 8.6%8.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.9%19.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 54.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos