Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video430 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Assistance For Immigrants results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44% saturation with 568 hits. Analysis detected 3,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,290 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (545 of 16,562 topics). This Legal Assistance For Immigrants is worse (more manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group.
Legal Assistance For Immigrants
Topic details
Total words: 1,290
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510096.7% percentile
14.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 44.0%44.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 38.6%38.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 28.9%28.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 26.3%26.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 25.8%25.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 19.8%19.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 15.3%15.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 44.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 38.6%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Topic 26.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 25.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Composition/Division: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos