Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leftist Politics results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 1,196 hits . Analysis detected 6,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (13,885 of 15,591 topics). This Leftist Politics is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group. Leftist Politics
Topic details
Total words: 9,404
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst