Topic summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leadership Changes results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 2,128 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,757 of 16,562 topics). This Leadership Changes is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Leadership Changes
Topic details
Total words: 1,800
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.4%11.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.5%8.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos