Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video953 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Law Enforcement Policy results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 648 hits. Analysis detected 5,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,859 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,414 of 16,562 topics). This Law Enforcement Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Law Enforcement Policy
Topic details
Total words: 2,859
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 13.1%13.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.8%13.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.4%7.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.7%22.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos