Topic summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos491 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Law Enforcement Actions results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 477 hits. Analysis detected 3,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,784 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,106 of 16,562 topics). This Law Enforcement Actions is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Law Enforcement Actions
Topic details
Total words: 2,784
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.1% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos