Topic summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video1,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Las Vegas Tourism results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 2,428 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,183 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,499 of 16,562 topics). This Las Vegas Tourism is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Las Vegas Tourism
Topic details
Total words: 3,183
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos