Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Larry Fink results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Anecdotal , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 552 hits . Analysis detected 3,459 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 79% (3,645 of 16,970 topics). This Larry Fink is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Larry Fink
Topic details
Total words: 2,256
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.5% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 24.5% 24.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 9.7% 9.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.7%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst