Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Larry Fink results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 552 hits. Analysis detected 3,459 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 79% (3,645 of 16,970 topics). This Larry Fink is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Larry Fink
Topic details
Total words: 2,256
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.5% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 24.5%24.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.7%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos