Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Language Diversity results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 2,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,239 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Language Diversity is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Language Diversity
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Language Diversity (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 4,239
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos