Topic summary
⁠90%2 analyzed articles/videos1,710 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Land Use Policy results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 1,157 hits. Analysis detected 7,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,085 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (7,117 of 23,425 topics). This Land Use Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Land Use Policy
Topic details
Total words: 6,085
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.7%12.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos