Topic summary
⁠46%3 analyzed articles/videos2,753 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lamine Yamal results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 2,318 hits. Analysis detected 8,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,919 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,418 of 16,562 topics). This Lamine Yamal is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Lamine Yamal
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.4%23.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos