Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video568 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lactose Intolerance results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 548 hits. Analysis detected 3,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,927 of 16,562 topics). This Lactose Intolerance is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Lactose Intolerance
Topic details
Total words: 2,272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510082.3% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 24.1%24.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.8%17.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.3%7.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.1%13.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos