Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kurds results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 534 hits. Analysis detected 5,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,316 of 16,562 topics). This Kurds is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Kurds
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,032
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.1%7.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos