Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ku Klux Klan results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Halo Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 225 hits . Analysis detected 1,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,979 of 15,845 topics). This Ku Klux Klan is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group. Ku Klux Klan
Topic details
Total words: 3,180
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst