Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Knicks Game 3 results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 368 hits . Analysis detected 2,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Knicks Game 3 is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Knicks Game 3
Topic details
Total words: 3,464
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst