Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kitchen results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 799 hits. Analysis detected 2,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,038 of 16,562 topics). This Kitchen is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Kitchen
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 24.3%24.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Best saucier⁠43%
Orlando Sentinel⁠44%By BestReviews⁠58%7/21/2026, 11:03:28 PM