Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kirk Herbstreit results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 302 hits. Analysis detected 1,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,041 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,953 of 16,562 topics). This Kirk Herbstreit is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
Kirk Herbstreit
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,041
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510082.2% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.1%15.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.2%9.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.2%8.2%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 29.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos