Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kershaw results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Loss Aversion, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 79.6% saturation with 473 hits. Analysis detected 1,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 594 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (635 of 16,562 topics). This Kershaw is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
Kershaw
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 594
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510096.2% percentile
14.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles594 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 79.6%79.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 44.8%44.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 35.0%35.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 25.3%25.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 32.0%32.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 16.5%16.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Topic 79.6%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 44.8%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 35.0%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 32.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos