Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kentucky Politics results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 908 hits. Analysis detected 4,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,260 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,347 of 15,341 topics). This Kentucky Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Kentucky Politics
Topic details
Total words: 3,260
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos