Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karianne Lisonbee results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Status Quo Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 692 hits. Analysis detected 4,034 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,634 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,551 of 16,562 topics). This Karianne Lisonbee is worse (more manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group.
Karianne Lisonbee
Topic details
Total words: 2,634
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.6% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.5%15.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.0%8.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos