Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Small Businesses results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 1,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,632 of 16,562 topics). This Kansas City Small Businesses is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Kansas City Small Businesses
Topic details
Total words: 2,760
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.9%11.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos