Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos5,135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Royals Stadium results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Loss Aversion, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,726 hits. Analysis detected 11,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,100 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (15,338 of 16,562 topics). This Kansas City Royals Stadium is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Kansas City Royals Stadium
Topic details
Total words: 18,100
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751007.4% percentile
1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos