Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Restaurants results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,063 hits. Analysis detected 9,705 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,624 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,979 of 16,562 topics). This Kansas City Restaurants is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Kansas City Restaurants
Topic details
Total words: 12,624
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos