Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video944 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Regulations results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Loss Aversion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 3,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,210 of 16,562 topics). This Kansas City Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Kansas City Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 3,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos