Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Preparations results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 1,123 hits. Analysis detected 6,945 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,652 of 16,562 topics). This Kansas City Preparations is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Kansas City Preparations
Topic details
Total words: 6,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.0%12.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos