Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl Rally results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 598 hits. Analysis detected 3,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,479 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,102 of 16,562 topics). This Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl Rally is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl Rally
Topic details
Total words: 1,479
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.3% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 39.0%39.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 40.4%40.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.7%14.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.1%23.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.8%3.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 40.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 39.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos