Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Art Walks results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 958 hits. Analysis detected 4,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,546 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,895 of 16,562 topics). This Kansas City Art Walks is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Kansas City Art Walks
Topic details
Total words: 3,546
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.0%27.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 14.2%14.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.4%19.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos