Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas Breastfeeding Coalition results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 584 hits. Analysis detected 2,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (15,818 of 16,562 topics). This Kansas Breastfeeding Coalition is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Kansas Breastfeeding Coalition
Topic details
Total words: 6,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751004.5% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos