Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kacey Musgraves results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 663 hits . Analysis detected 1,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 70% (4,999 of 16,562 topics). This Kacey Musgraves is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Kacey Musgraves
Topic details
Total words: 2,712
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.8% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 24.4% 24.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 21.0% 21.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst