Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These K Pop results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 433 hits. Analysis detected 2,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,251 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,026 of 16,559 topics). This K Pop is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
K Pop
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,251
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos