Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video2,259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juventud results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,062 hits. Analysis detected 4,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,728 of 16,562 topics). This Juventud is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Juventud
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos