Topic summary
38%1 analyzed article/video1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jury System results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Slippery Slope, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 2,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (11,066 of 16,562 topics). This Jury System is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Jury System
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos