Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jurassic Park results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 1,120 hits. Analysis detected 4,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,871 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,379 of 16,562 topics). This Jurassic Park is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Jurassic Park
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,871
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 39.0%39.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.7%20.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.7%17.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 39.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos