Topic summary
12% 1 analyzed article/video 960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Precedent results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 557 hits . Analysis detected 2,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,339 of 16,184 topics). This Judicial Precedent is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group. Judicial Precedent
Topic details
Total words: 3,840
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst