Topic summary
12%1 analyzed article/video960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Precedent results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 557 hits. Analysis detected 2,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,339 of 16,184 topics). This Judicial Precedent is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Judicial Precedent
Topic details
Total words: 3,840
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.5%14.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos