Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Harassment results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 1,930 hits. Analysis detected 8,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,579 of 15,769 topics). This Judicial Harassment is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Judicial Harassment
Topic details
Total words: 9,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.2%21.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos