Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Judging Panel results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 1,145 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Judging Panel is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Judging Panel
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,104
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 22.0%22.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.6%18.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.9%16.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.9%15.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos