Topic summary
⁠13%2 analyzed articles/videos1,415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judaism results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 318 hits. Analysis detected 3,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,040 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (14,707 of 15,854 topics). This Judaism is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Judaism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,040
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751007.2% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos