Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Journalism History results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 503 hits. Analysis detected 2,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (10,346 of 15,388 topics). This Journalism History is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Journalism History
Topic details
Total words: 3,768
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos