Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video1,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Aoun results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 518 hits. Analysis detected 4,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,215 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,278 of 16,562 topics). This Joseph Aoun is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Joseph Aoun
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠50%Joseph Aoun (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,215
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Why Israel May Never Leave Lebanon⁠69%
Newsweek⁠36%By Brendan Cole⁠36%7/21/2026, 1:00:00 AM