Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan U S Cooperation results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 56.8% saturation with 890 hits. Analysis detected 3,490 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,567 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,459 of 15,769 topics). This Jordan U S Cooperation is worse (more manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group.
Jordan U S Cooperation
Topic details
Total words: 1,567
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.8% percentile
9.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 56.8%56.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 17.5%17.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 18.6%18.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 22.3%22.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.3%16.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.8%27.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.1%5.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 56.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 17.5%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.0%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos