Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jordan Attack results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 639 hits. Analysis detected 3,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Jordan Attack is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jordan Attack
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.3%22.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos